Oops! They did it again
LinkedIN continues to inactivate user accounts
-- a _kt75 | note
_NEW: follow the development of wolframscharnhorst.blogspot.com and explore all _kt75 | publications via the news db... and leave your comments here

- the account is inactivated without any prior warning
- the only contact path is directly via some sort of help center of LinkedIN
- if happened for the second time or more, the individual request for re-activation of the account is processed rather slowly
- the accusations are as always: spam, phishing or connecting with to many people and the accusations are not documented at all
This rather in-transparent and basically crude way of "coordinating" member behavior in principle must result in a functional loss of the usefulness of social media as such. Essential questions popup like:
- How does LinkedIN evaluate accusations like spamming, phishing, wrong commenting, etc.? What are the benchmarks?
- Who actually accuses? More and more one gets the impression that everybody can accuse anybody for doing wrong resulting in the inactivation of the respective member account.
- What in terms of member participation is actually still allowed?
- Isn't it LinkedIN that encourages the members to network (today one simply can connect with almost everybody without indicating any reason like in earlier times)?
- Isn't it LinkedIN that motivates the members to share comments as much as possible?
Feel invited to reflect about the above, comment it, share it, etc. and follow the further development of a new sustainability page.